“There were no complaints about the aesthetic results but, as the treating clinicians, we are not excited about the results, professional reward, or financial profitablity of retrieving the impacted cuspid.” In the second part of this article, we will discuss the common possi-ble limitations when treating cases with impacted teeth. nal of General Orthodontics. 1990; 1: 12-21. 3. Basdra, Efthimia K., Magdalini Kiok-pasoglou, and Angelika Stellzig. "The Class II Division II craniofacial type is associated with numerous congen-ital tooth anomalies." The European Journal of Orthodontics 22.5 (2000): 529-535. 4. Dent Update 2013; 40:770-777. 5. Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting canines by extrac-tion of primary canines. Eur J Fig. 28 Orhtod 1988; 10(1):283-295. 6. Palatally impacted maxillary canines. IJO. 2008; 19 (3). 7. Becker A, Smith P, Beher R. The Inci-dence of anomalous maxillary lateral incisors in relation to palatally displaced cuspids. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:24-29 8. Ortho Arch. http://orthoarchshop. com. (847) 885-7805 reFerences 1. Becker, Adrian et al. Palatally impacted canines: The case for closed surgical exposure and immediate orthodontic traction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthope-dics. 2013 Volume 143, Issue 4, 459. 2. E Lorenz T. Orthodontic considera-tions of the impacted canine. Jour-You’re invited to the American Orthodontic Society’s 2019 Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. on Sept. 19-22, 2019. All general and pediatric dentists can have the ultimate opportunity to expand their practices and further educate themselves on the latest in techniques, clinical advancements, practice management and products. www.orthodontics.com Winter 2019 31
Journal of the American Orthodontic Society Winter 2019: Page 31
