Figure 5a can make informed decisions on GP treatment limits, bite strategies, distal-ization and arch expansion—all within non-surgical, fixed-appliance frameworks. Clearly, re-establishing ceph’s prominence in GP orthodontic CE will enhance patient outcomes and professional competence. 21 References 1. Ghodasra, R., and M. Brizuela. Orthodontics, Cephalometric Analy-sis.” StatPearls , NCBI Bookshelf, 2023, Jul 17; Manabe, A., T. Ishida, E. Kanda, and T. Ono. “Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral matura-tion: A Japanese cross-sectional study.” PLoS One , 2022, Apr 6, 17(4): e0265272; and Hourfar, J., G. Kinzinger, L. Frye, and J. Lisson. “Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodiver-gent and hyperdivergent class II patients—a retrospective cephalo-metric investigation.” Clin Oral Inves-tig , 2023, Jun 23, 27(8): 4773–4784. 2. O’Brien, K. “What Is the Best Method of Correcting Increased Overbite: Turbos or Arch Wires?” Figure 5b Figure 5c orthodontics.com Spring 2026 15
Journal of the American Orthodontic Society Spring 2026: Page 15
